Zeitgeist Zephyr

Spirit of the Westward Wind

Archive for June, 2009


Learning to Climb

Maybe it’s because I’m procrastinating that I’m typing this blog entry so late at night, but at times during the night and even through the natural course of the day really, I find myself swimming in a sea of thoughts searching for answers to questions in life, big and small.  On the plate today, an issue that has consumed every spare moment of my time this summer, the demon child commonly referred to as Calculus.   

At the risk of sounding like a distressed college student tired of putting forth the effort, this really is an issue that extends beyond the class itself.  While not normally a fan of country music, I have picked up on a little jingle by Lonestar called Mountains that is particularly appropriate for this hour in my life.  The main chorus of the song goes

“There are times in life when you gotta crawl
Lose your grip, trip and fall
When you can’t lean on no-one else
That’s when you find yourself
I’ve been around and noticed that
Walking’s easier when the road is flat
Them danged ole’ hills will get you every time
Yeah, the good Lord gave us mountains
So we could learn how to climb”
 

hpim1467.JPG

When it comes to my education, and math in particular, it really is like climbing up a mountain.  I’ve struggled in math since at least middle school, and it’s been a very deliberate and drawn out “mountain road.”  So when confronted suddenly with a math course that seems impassable, it’s nothing new really.  It’s not like a light bulb popped on that revealed how cumbersome numbers are in my mind, I’ve always known that it’s been there and that it’s been a problem.  What seems to make this different is that the foreseeable chain reaction following this course runs deeper than I can imagine.  

This is usually just a decision to wait and take it again another semester or to do the best to pass it during the summer, but that’s easier said than done.  While true that it can be taken at a later date, why not finish it now?  It comes down to sanity.  I’m up studying later than I ever did while I was at school during the year with potentially a couple more hours ahead of me before going to bed in the early morning.  All in a futile attempt to pass a quiz over a topic I know little about, a pattern that has continued for weeks (talk about a boost to your morale!)

But at the same time the very difficulties which pull me down and under are the same that make me stronger.  Is this an instance where I need to suck it up and study for close to 6 or 8 hours a day till I get it right, growing stronger in the process but ultimately draining myself in the end or am I picking the wrong battlefield?  Next semester promises to be challenging if I’m taking this calculus course again or if I’ve moved on to the next one.  But could this decision set a precedent for other decisions yet to come?  

Seems like I’ve turned this into a situation that could determine the future of my entire life.  No additional pressure whatsoever now!  I should get back to studying now, 3.5 more hours to go or so.  (Maybe less if I can’t figure this stuff out.)  Thank you for listening.

Two Probes, One Moon

Today marks a milestone in NASA’s efforts to return humans to the Moon by 2020.  Two unmanned spacecraft, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS), entered into their respective orbits around the Moon over the last few hours.  Their missions are both aimed at learning more about our closest celestial neighbor so that we can be as prepared as possible before sending humans back to explore and settle its surface.

The LRO is very similar to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) currently orbiting the Red Planet in terms of mission objectives and design.  It will provide some of the most detailed maps of the Moon in history while mapping out its mineral distribution on the surface and scanning for the ever elusive water ice.

LCROSS will pursue the latter exclusively, scheduled to impact the Moon sometime in October into a permanently shadowed crater near the southern polar region of the Moon to look for water ice.  It is actually two craft, one is the Earth-departure stage for the LRO and LCROSS missions and the other is an observation satellite which will be making its own kamikaze descent behind the EDS.  It will view the impact and send back information about the content of the ejecta cloud before impacting the Moon moments later.  The goal is to determine once and for all if water ice exists on the Moon and if so in what quantities. 

LRO will start beaming back images within the next week and I will be sure to post a couple here as they become available.

A World of Change

Wow, what an eventful last week and a half it’s been!

In both good ways and bad, as I’m sure you’ve already noticed.  Whether it’s been NASA launching it’s first robotic probes to The Moon in over a decade or North Korea thumping its chest as a regime change seems imminent, there’s definitely been enough to keep the media busy.  But no story over the last week has been more captivating then the social fallout from the Iranian election.  As many already know (or may not know), the social turmoil that has gripped the country over the past few days was sparked when the incumbent president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared he had won re-election with 63% of the vote.  Calling bull, the supporters of the opposition candidate, Mirhossein Mousavi, took the streets in protest.  At first in marches, and in more recent days, near or complete riots.

In resposnse, perhaps embarassament that they had lost control of a significant percentage of the citizenry, Iran has initiated a media blackout to all foreign media outlets, making it increasingly difficult to know what exactly is going on.  Efforts to block the Internet have been met with futility as websites like Facebook, Twitter, and YoutTube have been used extensively to mobilize and organize opposition movements and have allowed people to spread news of what is happening by a virtual word of mouth.  What’s been remarkable is that there is still enough information flowing out of Iran through these outlets alone that mainstream media outlets around the world have been able to report on the crisis in Iran nonstop for the last several days.

One of the more shocking developments to come out tonight was a video submitted by an iReporter on CNN that depicted what appeared to be police raids in Tehran.  Eerily reminescent of Krystalnacht, a raid ordered by Hitler and carried out by the S.S. to capture Jews throughout Berlin before World War Two, the video shows only the flashing lights of cars as their alarms are blaring from the gunshots erupting from the raids.  Screams can be heard peircing through the night as nothing short of chaos ensues.

Given the political climate in Iran, whether spurred into action out of a dislike of their own government, very conservative in nature, or influenced by more liberal foreign policies by the United States, such as President Obama’s willingness to sit down and talk with Iran, or even seeing a burgeoning democracy next door in Iraq… whatever the reasons, we could be witnessing the beginning of a period of civil unrest in Iran, not unlike the Revolution in 1979.  It could in fact be another revolution, but it is hard to tell at this point.

Only time will tell, but I think that President Obama is making the right move by not getting directly involved.  If he did, it would be going against the reason for voting for him, which was under the assumption he wouldn’t drag the United States into the internal affairs of another country.  From what I’ve been reading, most western democracies, including the U.S., support the opposition movement in Iran.  That I keep hearing conservative pundits (or gas bags as they appear on Fox News) ridicule Obama for not taking action on the matter is disconcerting.

There are really three historical precedents for the unrest we are witnessing right now and why the U.S. should stay out of it.  The first would, obviously, be the 1979 Revolution, of which Ahmadinejad played a role.  That revolution resulted in the attack on and capture of Americans a the embassy in Tehran, a standoff that would last for 444 days.  This was the incident that precipitated the current diplomatic position the United States and Iran have been in for the last 30 years, which until just recently included zero diplomatic contact whatsoever.

The other historical precedent is the 1991 intifada in Iraq.  Staged shortly after the end of the Gulf War, they were led by Shia Muslims who were under the impression that the Hussein regime was weak and anti-government prostests were staged.  The United States also played a role in encouraging the protests and the view among the Iraqis was that the U.S. would aid in any attempts to overthrow the government.  The United States didn’t help and tens of thousands of Iraqis died as the government cracked down on the uprisings.  While the U.S. can’t be blamed in full for what happened because there was, in reality, little the U.S. could do to aid in the uprising.

The final precedent is the Bay of Pigs Invasion.  Need I say more?

 

 The truth is, in modern times at least, the U.S. has not had hardly any luck in helping anti-government uprisings without someone getting upset, usually the locals.  That’s the reason there’s an insurgency in Iraq and interfering in a potential revolution that has already been started by the people of Iran would be foolish on our part.  Let them handle it.  Many in Iran look up to the United States (in fact so much that the people of Iran actually favor the U.S. more than any other Middle Eastern nation), but lets not take advantage of that good will and bring them into our sphere of influence.

If all else fails, as the violence and civil unrest settle and the electoral crisis resolves itself, for better or worse, Iran will have been shaken to its core and it will have become apparent to its president and supreme leaders that they must change their ways or risk further uprising from the citizenry.  Change is inevitable, and I would wager that it is going to work in the favor of everyone, from the average Iranian to Israel to Europe to the U.S.

Things are changing in Iran, and as one Twitterer put it, “On 9/11, we were all Americans. Tonight, we are all Iranians.”  May Democracy live on and my thoughts and prayers are with every Iranian protesting against Ahmadinejad, and really, the supreme leader.  It’s time for change.

Changing the Format

I’ve finally motivated myself to change the theme and overall format of my blog, so bear with me over the next few days as I get things straightened out once and for all.  Of note all posts are now open for comment, no signing in or registering is required anymore, and I am in the process of providing ways to link to my posts on Facebook and other social networking sites.

On Facebook’s Targeted Advertising

For those who don’t know, the popular networking site Facebook uses targeted advertising based on someone’s interests to increase the efficiency of advertisements on the website.  Users can either rate an ad with a thumbs up or thumbs down as something they would like to see more of.  I’ve never rated ads, and never will, because frankly I don’t care too much about most of the ads featured on Facebook.  But apparently, since I fit the demographic of someone who could potentially be a starving college student, I’ve been targeted with some get rich quick ads, promoting the concept that I don’t need to spend the summer flipping burgers to get money.  I couldn’t help but notice one such targeted ad that errily resembles french fries that are flipping me off.  Take a look.

fbwtf2.JPG

It might be hard to read as it is displayed here, but the caption beneath it reads: “Don’t flip burgers, get a real job!”  A note of discretion to the advertiser, while I might not want to flip burgers for a living, convincing me to check out your product by having some french fries flip me off isn’t a good way to start!

Lolz