Zeitgeist Zephyr

Spirit of the Westward Wind

Archive for March, 2008


War of the Americas? - Another Perspective

As those who know me are aware, I am typically very anti-war. I think there are other ways of solving issues than going straight for the guns. In my book, diplomacy is the way to go; war is the very last alternative when all else fails.

One of the blogs on my blogroll, Jaded Sage, just posted an interesting essay on why Hugo Chavez needs to be done away with. It echoes my own feelings on the issue, with a little bit more of a pro-active stance on dealing with him and the diplomatic crisis with Colombia right now between them.

I definately recommend reading it. (See my last post for my views on the subject.)

War of the America’s? (And Bush’s Legacy)

Well, here we go again.  It looks like a series of recent events in South America could threaten to draw the United States into yet another international issue, upholding our self-stated obligation to ‘mediate’ affairs in the Western Hemisphere.  Even though I do firmly believe in the United States and that it should maintain its ability to settle disputes before they get violent, it would be a catastrophe if we chose to get involved in a war in South America at this period in time.   Here’s why.

The dispute started over the weekend when Colombia launched a series of raids into the neighboring country of Ecuador.  Venezuela, the third largest supplier of oil to the United States and a self acclaimed enemy, is coming to Ecuador’s rescue.  Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has ordered the evacuation and shut down of the Venezuelan embassy in Bogota, Colombia.  He has also ordered troops to be massed on the frontier region between Venezuela and Columbia and to be prepared should a military strike be ordered. 

Any military action on the part of the United States would further strain our army.  That’s the reason why not to get involved.  If we weren’t in a war that was essentially over an imagined threat in Iraq, I might be more willing to accept military action in this dispute-within reason.  Remember, Venezuela (the nation we would likely fight against), might be our enemy, but they are also a hand that feeds us (oil.)

This has the potential to become yet another issue to debate in the upcoming election, but more importantly if it does lead to war, this would be yet another stress that the current administration would have to worry about.  Ultimately, a war in South America would ruin what little there is left to salvage of President Bush’s image. 

This does bring up another point that I’ve been thinking about over the past couple of days, and that is if President Bush will ever be able to regain a positive image in the eyes of history.  It happened to Harry Truman, why can’t it happen for Bush?  I suspect it won’t.

Truman made some tough decisions during his presidency; dropping the atomic bombs, entering into a conflict with North Korea that has lasted to this day, and effectively establishing the United State’s strategy for the whole of the Cold War.  His image while president was grim.  Much like Bush, he was fighting a war that appeared to have no end in sight (still the case with 30,000 troops massed at the 38th Parallel today.)  However, he was also fighting another war, one that brought the United States to the ranks of world superpower.  Europe was effectively rebuilt on his watch and with U.S. money and an effective organization of nations, the United Nations, was established to mediate world events and politics.  Up through the Clinton administration, these gains that Truman made could still be effectively seen.

When Bush entered office, the United States was the most powerful nation in the history of the world: politically, militarily, and economically.  When he leaves office, he leaves the U.S. with a tarnished image as an effective player on the world stage.  He bypassed the UN to march off to a war that had no basis in reality, his policies and methods of dealing with other nations has affected America’s credibility on the political front.  The economy is in the worst shape it’s been in in decades.  I wish that I could say that he has improved our military, since that is where all our money is going, but I can’t even say that.  Recent reports and events indicate that our military is so strained, America could not effectively handle a disaster here at home, because nearly all available resources are in Iraq.  Cue Katrina and Greensburg.

My point?  It does remain highly unlikely that a U.S. involved war will happen.  I still like to think that Bush is smarter than that.  America has pledged that it will mediate events in the Western Hemisphere.  That’s fine.  It should be nothing more than that.  A war involving one of our geographically closest enemies (Venezuela) is a BAD idea.  Our army can’t handle anything more than a limited involvement as it is; it isn’t worth it. 

*As I’ve typed this, news broke that Bush is backing Colombia.  He is requesting that the Senate approve a free trade agreement with Colombia. 

In Like a Lion?

Yes, March is here, and with it that old weather saying, “in like a lion, out like a lamb.”  For those here in the Kansas City area, it has definitely been coming in like a lion, with rather blustery conditions defining the first two days of March.  It has yet to be seen if March will, in due process, go out like a lamb.

March is coming in like a lion as well on the political front.  To start off the month will be the primaries in Texas and Ohio, which could settle once and for all who is the front runner on the Democratic side.  Then again, it might not.

Hillary and Barack are running two campaigns with similar platforms on the issues, but two entirely different ways of gathering votes.  In the past week, we have seen the Clinton campaign run ad’s that are questioning Obama’s ability to handle sudden international crises.  To which the Obama camp reminds us, who out of the two supported the now disastrous Iraq war?

Obama in Somalian garbHillary in a head scarf

 We have also seen, whether done voluntarily or not by Hillary’s campaign, an attempt to spread more rumors about Obama’s cultural heritage and religious beliefs by circulating images of him in traditional Somalian garb.  Wait, is this a picture of Hillary dressed in traditional garb as well?  Tsk, tsk.

I readily admit, even being the avid Obama supporter that I am, that Obama might not have all of the experience that Hillary offers.  They have both, however, been in the U.S. Senate for a similar period of time and Hillary’s time as First Lady overlaps some of Obama’s time as an Illinois state senator.  During his 1997-2004 tenure as Illinois state senator, Obama was a lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.  He also spent a lot of time as a community organizer while living in Chicago.  Obama can produce a long list of leadership accomplishments, in particular an ability to work with people.  Don’t trust me?  Read his memoirs or any web bio about him. 

I’d be willing to trust someone who promises change and a different way of doing things than someone who, honestly, still represents the status quo.  Hillary Clinton is ‘old politics.’  Barack Obama offers to bring a responsible sensibility and a sense of pragmatism to a political system in desperate need of repair.  

Using a Biblical reference, America is in the lion’s den.  Obama appears to be the lion, March 4 will determine if his roar (his charisma) lives up to it’s ability to ’rally the troops.’  It will be an interesting week indeed.